| |
Follow this link and give my video a five-star rating!!
The first thing you are probably asking is, 'Why is it called a Bonus Video Question? Why didn't they just call it Video Question #4?' Well, at the beginning of the contest, the organisers had promised 3 video questions. But as the contest evolved and political developments unfolded they decided to add one extra video question to the repetoire. They must have felt that calling it Video Question #4 would have been confusing to the contestants, all of whom were expecting no more than three video questions.
The Bonus Video Question asked, "Will Michael Ignatieff lead the Liberals to power?"
This is truly a stupid question because it is, by its nature, entirely speculative. Michael Ignatieff himself once said that he won't answer 'anticipatory hypotheticals', and this question is definitely an anticipatory hypothetical. I mean, it's no different than asking, "Do you think the Bills will win their next game?" Actually that's not even a fair comparison because, unlike the Bills, Iggy might actually win. But the point is, the question is entirely speculative. It's like asking if this coin is going to land heads or tails. Will Ignatieff lead the Liberals to power? Maybe. Maybe not. My crystal ball is not under warranty any more, so I can't really answer that question too effectively.
Nevertheless, here is the answer I did give:
|
| | Posted 12/25/2008 1:57 AM - 4 Views - 0 eProps - 0 comments
- recommend
  - recs0
- share
- email
 - sent0
|
